By
KENNETH R. FLETCHER
Capital News
ServiceANNAPOLIS -
Environmental Protection Agency
enforcement against Maryland schools for
asbestos-related violations have
exploded in the past year, from less
than one per year from 2001 to 2006 to
16 actions since September 2006.
The 16 actions filed between
September 2006 and September 2007
included everything from small private
schools to some of the largest school
systems in the state, according to a
Capital News Service analysis of EPA
data.
None of the violations are related to
dangerous exposure to the carcinogen,
school and environmental officials said.
The actions mostly involve problems with
the paperwork schools must keep to track
asbestos, and the increase is due to a
rise in state inspections and stricter
enforcement.
But the EPA does not take violations
lightly: Penalties for schools in
violation run up to $6,500 per day, or
schools can escape the fine by spending
the same amount to bring themselves up
to code.
Major violators include school
systems in Baltimore City and county.
The EPA reported in September 2006 that
the city spent $305,730 to bring schools
up to code, while the county spent
$245,538, all for violations related to
recordkeeping.
Schools are supposed to maintain
asbestos management plans but it is
often not a top priority for busy
educators, said Mardel Knight, head of
Maryland's asbestos inspection unit.
Sometimes the plan "gets thrown out
or locked up in a drawer," Knight said.
"The principals have so many things to
do that they could care less."
Knight's inspectors often find that
plans are missing or not updated.
Sometimes schools say they sent out a
required annual notification but cannot
find a copy of it. Others do not have
records of recent inspections.
"We don't find very many in
compliance when we inspect," said
Knight, who estimated that roughly 90
percent of Maryland schools inspected
are not in compliance with asbestos
regulations.
Schools are selected for inspection
randomly. In the last two years,
inspections by Knight and her three
inspectors have increased from about 25
each year to 60.
In the past, the EPA let the state
give some schools a chance to bring
themselves up to code before sending the
inspections on to the federal agency,
said Harry Daw, with the EPA's region
III enforcement office. Often, no formal
EPA action was taken if the schools
pulled into compliance.
But in fiscal 2007, the EPA began
requiring that states send it all
inspections directly for enforcement,
Daw said.
Even though it seems like a
technicality, Knight said the plans need
to be taken seriously. Schools must know
where asbestos is, or renovation could
be done in an area with undocumented
asbestos, releasing the fibers and
posing a threat to students and staff.
"Bottom line, it's a carcinogen and
none of it is a safe level of exposure,"
she said.
Asbestos was once commonly used in
ceiling and floor tiles, insulation and
other building materials. But in the
1980s, breathing asbestos fibers was
shown to cause lung diseases, including
cancer.
While asbestos locked away in
building materials does not necessarily
pose a risk, when it is disturbed or
deteriorates particles enter the air and
can be breathed in. The 1986 Asbestos
Hazard Emergency Response Act required
schools to "manage in place" the
material, instead of requiring costly
asbestos removal.
"There is asbestos in the schools. We
all have that, every school system out
there has that," said Ray Prokop,
director of facilities for Carroll
County Public Schools.
All schools containing asbestos --
and that includes any school built
before October 1998 -- are required to
have asbestos management plans outlining
where the material is and what steps are
being taken to contain it.
Schools must also annually notify
parents and staff of the plans, train
maintenance staff for asbestos safety
and regularly inspect areas with
asbestos.
Since those regulations took effect,
there has not been "one single record of
building occupant coming to harm from
release of asbestos," said David Lever,
director of Maryland's public school
construction program. But school
officials do not treat the issue
lightly.
"None of us is interested in a
situation that endangers building
occupants," Lever said.
Bringing a school up to code can be
costly. Specially licensed contractors
must be hired and keeping up with the
regular staff inspections can be tough.
"There is no denying that it is
labor-consuming, time-consuming and
expensive, but you don't want to
question the worth and put a child or
building occupant in danger," said Kathy
Dempsey, an Archdiocese of Washington
spokeswoman.
In 2005 and 2006, the Catholic school
system spent $72,000 to bring dozens of
elementary schools up to code, according
to EPA records, though Dempsey said the
total cost may end up being be much
higher.
To make sure they stay in compliance,
she said the schools "now have massive
checklists where they keep track as to
when each school is supposed to report
in."
Baltimore City officials blamed their
asbestos violations on new charter
schools. They said they have tried to
guide operators of those privately run
public schools, while requiring
asbestos-awareness training for their
own maintenance workers and new
principals.
"We have doubled our efforts with our
own schools to make sure everyone is
aware," said Keith Scroggins, chief
operating officer for the city's
schools.
Knight said schools have no excuse
for not complying with asbestos
regulations. Maryland offers free
workshops around the state that teach
schools how to stay up to code. Knight
said this year's workshops aimed at
small schools, which make up a large
portion of violations, were poorly
attended.
She suggested that any schools unsure
of their compliance with asbestos
regulations contact her unit in the
Maryland Department of the Environment
for advice. It is easier and cheaper to
make the necessary updates on their own
time than under an EPA deadline, she
said.
"Call us before we call you," she
said. "If you are on the random
inspection list, you don't get any
passes."
EPA Asbestos Actions Against Schools
Exploded in 2006-2007 School Year<
^By CAPITAL NEWS SERVICE=
ANNAPOLIS - After several years of
spotty enforcement, the number of
actions taken against Maryland schools
by the Environmental Protection Agency
for problems with the school's asbestos
plans skyrocketed in the last year. Some
of the actions cited multiple schools in
a large system, but many were taken
against small private or religious
schools.
FILED
SCHOOL
CITY
2002
October
Montgomery County
Rockville
2004
December
The French International School
Chevy Chase
2005
September
Calvert Co. Public Schools
Prince Frederick
2006
August
North Harford High School
Pylesville
September
Baltimore Co. Public Schools
Towson
September
Baltimore City Schools
Baltimore
September
The Archdiocese of Washington
D.C. area
December
Monocacy Valley Montessori School
Frederick
2007
January
Maryland School for the Deaf
Frederick/Ellicott
March
Beth El Preschool
Baltimore
May
Washington New Church
Mitchellville
June
The Barnesville School
Barnesville
June
The School of Original Thought
Baltimore
June
Ashland Preschool
Cockeysville
June
Cedar Grove Preschool
Deale
July
Church of the Redeemer Day School
Baltimore
August
Victory Baptist Church
Charlotte Hall
August
Montessori Children's House
Bowie
September
Carroll County Board of Education
Westminster
September
Worcester County Public Schools
Newark
SOURCE: Environmental Protection Agency
Enforcement and Compliance History
Online, www.epa-echo.gov.
|