LEONARDTOWN (Oct. 24, 2007) On Tuesday
evening at the Leaonard Hall Governmental Center
the legislators and commissioners met to hear
proposals for new laws from the general public
and the board. Proposal to require equal
weight be given to views of citizens as to the
St. Mary’s College trustees in decisions
regarding future construction at St. Mary’s
City.
Brian Seifert: “I am
here tonight for the building program at St.
Mary’s City, for the boathouse and 4 weeks ago
at a meeting here, we spoke out about what St.
Mary’s College is doing. The offending
boathouse, but now also a new 11,000 square foot
building, an overpass, etc. The college
president used references to a brutal murder and
even Virginia Tech and these references were
picked up by local media and some asked where
were the college president and the senior
building manager of the college when it came
time to talk at the town meeting held last week
in Ridge. There were 140 citizens at the
meeting and they came to learn what Sen. Dyson
thought about this and what their fellow
citizens thought about the public arrogance of
the college, more than 400 have so far signed
the petitions. We have no staff, no salary and
no per diem, we just want change, and what do we
want tonight?
The College and the trustees treat the public in
a haughty and dictatorial way. Not one member
of this commission has the right to deal with
the college, you are powerless to do anything
about mandating citizen participation. The
system is broken and has to be fixed. Let them
eat cake, please don’t let this continue to
happen. There are those who will try to kill
this proposal. I suspect you will get calls from
the President, the trustees, contractors,
contributors to the college, I know these things
because it was my business to be aware of the se
things when I was a federal employee.
Del. Bohanan works closely with Steny Hoyer and
he is on the board of Trustees, can we really
expect John to take sides when he has to deal
with Steny. Sure, I think that we can expect
John and Steny to take the side of the
citizens. We need them to join Sen. Dyson in
the consistent way he has supported our
position, we need a deep and meaningful way in
the college manages construction process.”
St. Mary’s College President Maggie O’Brien:
“Rather than responding to that, I will say that
the college has always had a good neighbor
policy, with programs, concerts, scholarships,
we oppose this recommendation, we have always
had a strong relationship, almost all of the
campus is within the critical area commission.
Sen. Roy Dyson: “What
does it hurt to involve the community more, we
have to agree that this whole situation could
have been handled much better. When they had
the Science center, we know the Board of
Trustees made a decision and what would it hurt
to bring the community in to communicate with
the college. I have a memo here from the
college of Southern Maryland, they just want an
avenue of communication here, it has broken
down, you wouldn’t be here tonight if there was
a way to communicate their concerns here, what
they saw was once the outreach started, it was
to get the project done as fast as possible.
Maggie O’Brien: “In
August when we found out that there was a
problem with community we got the 4c’s and in
1994 we had a community meeting and no one came
to the meeting. This does not violate any
historic land rules. We made this public over
and over and over again. We have met every
single permit; the college has been cooperative
with the community. Maybe we are not met with a
great deal of appreciation and we do try very
hard.
Del. Anthony O’Donnell,
(R. Lusby), who is the House Minority Leader, in
a swipe at Dyson, brought out that the members
of the board of trustees are appointed by the
governor to six year terms with the advise and
consent of the State Senate, meaning that Dyson
has a review over who is appointed. “I wanted
to remind myself of how the board is comprised,
Congressman Hoyer is a member, and some of those
members are here, who appoints them to the
board, they are six year terms and they are
renewable, approved by the Maryland Senate.”
Cindy Royals: “I am a
citizen of St. Mary’s County and I am a board of
trustees member and we of the college have
listened to many criticisms and I want to go on
record for the defense of the college,, we have
followed all of the permits process as
proscribed by law. One of the facts about this
building is that is a very green building, and
is very environmentally friendly; the Maryland
Historic Trust said that it is compatible with
the historic rules. We devised a process and we
had two open forums with 100 persons taking
part, we accepted the community members, they
were not handpicked to rubber stamp the plans.”
Peg Duchesne: “I am
president of the Alumni Association, the
college is an institution committed to the
community and the hard work of J. Frank Raley
and William Donald Schaefer have kept the
college independent, almost half of the trustees
live in Southern Maryland or maintain residences
here.”
Mike O’Brien: “I am
chairman of the building and grounds committee
of the board of trustees and I can tell you that
having seen it constructed it had more of impact
on me than it did in the planning process, the
door is not closed, it is inappropriate to have
people demand it be removed, it is possible that
it be relocated. The objections to this came
after the building was built. We would like to
have a process for the community to get involved
in earlier stages of planning.
Tom Daugherty: “I am
an alumni of the college back when it was a two
year college, the college’s policy on tuition
has been raised as another issue, what was left
out of the argument is that the other
institutions received a hefty additional
appropriations equal to what they would have
gotten if they had increased the tuition, and we
did not. We find it troublesome that those who
are in command of those facts would chose to
ignore that information. Citizen input would be
given equal weight to that of the board of
trustees and we find that is in direct
contradiction to the statutory authority of the
college. The college fully supports the
involvement of the public, I ask that you who
represent us, represent all of us, not just the
most vocal.”
Robert Nessiean: “I
live across from the college and I appreciate
everyone being here, in the years I have lived
here, I don’t think I have more respect that I
have to look at the boathouse every day and it
is an abomination to St. Mary’s City and anybody
who knows anything about St. Mary’s City and
knows that this is a pristine river, what hey
are building, the river center is a building
which is approximately four times the size of
the boathouse, it contains about 60 percent
functions which have no purpose on the water,
banquet rooms, offices, that don’t have to be on
the water, why can’t they put it back further,
the alumni building, why do they have to intrude
on historic St. Mary’s City, they need to give
what they are doing some serious thought. It is
irreparable what they are doing.”
Gladys Segal: “I
would have hoped that these people would have
attended the town meeting and listen to the
people and to Senator Dyson. I question the
number of people who sat on the ad hoc
committee, they told me that they were limited
to what they could discuss, the river center
building, I read a little note in the paper that
they have already violated the Critical Area
Commission, the stormwater is running off, but
they are giving flexibility to the college, if I
had polluted the river, I would have been told
the stop construction immediately, I tell you
gentlemen there is something wrong there, I have
been here since 1951 and I have never before
opposed anything at St. Mary’s College, I told
everyone, parents who came down here and were
appalled at the security, I don’t want to see a
long pier, a $2 million bridge and I thank Sen.
Dyson for all you are doing.”
Don Beck: “I just
have a few remarks, down the hall and around the
corner is a community heritage award and it says
explore and enjoy our heritage, we are
destroying our heritage. What’s the first thing
you see, the rowing center, what will be the
last thing you see, the rowing center. I was
next door at a social function and he told me
that he said we were blindsided by this, and
then I saw later that he was on the board of
trustees. This all could have been a public
notice, but we don’t have to do it, Roy Dyson
summed it completely when he said you may be
legally correct but you are morally wrong. What
does the Freedom of Conscience statute with his
arms open looking out over the river, now what
does he see? Follow the money, the path is with
the donors."
Sen. Dyson:
“I think it is very information for a liberal
arts college to not involve the community in an
important decision to engage the community, yes
I did say, legally correct, but morally wrong, I
went to the Attorney General, but now everyone
in this county can look at the boathouse and say
look what the college did, when they have a
critical area issue. This could have been
resolved; there is ample evidence from the
Science Building fiasco. They did try to involve
the community and if that had been maintained,
we would not have had this problem.”