Something
Stinks in Leonardtown and Piney Point
News and
Commentary:
Board Attempt to Flush Problem is Real Conflict of Interest for
Russell
By Kenneth C. Rossignol
ST. MARY’S TODAY
LEONARDTOWN (Jan. 15,
2008) --- Six years ago, St. Mary’s County’s Land Use office
approved the record plat of a new subdivision called St.
George’s Peninsula and noted on the plat that the five new
waterfront lots on St. George’s Creek would be allowed to hook
up to public water and sewer.
Today, that plan was
given the needed sewer and water amendment approval required to
make it happen and the vote came on a 3-2 basis with the
deciding vote coming from Commissioner President Jackie Russell
(D. St. George’s Island).
Russell’s employment with
the Seafarers Union, which operates the training center and
union resort at Piney Point, was expected to be cited by him as
a reason for abstaining from voting, as the Seafarers sold the
farm to the Baltimore developer who now owns the property.
Had Russell abstained,
the proposal would have died on an expected 2-2 tie vote, as
Commissioners Raley and Dement were leaning in favor while
Jarboe and Mattingly were opposed.
But Russell, while
casting a vote which settles the burning issue of should the
county allow a county agency to grant one form of development
approval while withholding from the property owners final
approval, now propels himself into the public spotlight as
citizens are already questioning the legality and ethical
propriety of his vote.
Commissioner Larry Jarboe
(R. Golden Beach) and Commissioner Tommy Mattingly (D.
Leonardtown) found a way to hang their hat on the side of denial
by noting that while development was approved in Leonardtown,
the sewer capacity would not allow it to go forward and
suggested that the policy prohibition against allowing
non-failing land to be hooked up to the Piney Point force sewer
line be used to deny public sewer to the five lots.
Part of the rationale for approving the lots was the developer
moving dwelling units around on the overall several hundred acre
farm, landing those dwelling units, in theory only, to the
desirable waterfront lots which were newly created. In short,
they were conjured, configured and conjectured, which is
apparently all one must do in St. Mary’s County.
Commissioner Larry Jarboe
pointed out that the property didn’t have prior EDU (Equivalent
Dwelling Units) assigned to them.
Raley pointed out that
the county had approved these lots on a recorded plat and that
citizens should be able to rely on the certifications on the
signed plats which stated that the properties would be allowed
to hook up to public sewer.

Commissioners Larry Jarboe (R. Golden Beach) and Dan Raley (D.
Great Mills). Raley told the Board that the public should be
able to rely upon the county approving a lot for building, as
had been done in the instance of the five lots at St. George's
Peninsula. Jarboe argued that the county often is in the
position of not being able to guarantee sewer and water hookups.
ST. MARY'S TODAY photo
These
remarks were made at the St. Mary’s Commissioner’s meeting:
Land Use staffer Jeff
Jackman: “That line out to Loveville was done to accommodate
failed septic systems and that is the same here for Andover
Estates. We are addressing failed septics to the Piney Point
force main.”
Commissioner Dan Raley
(D. Great Mills) : “In St. Mary’s County overall, we have septic
systems where they cannot be fixed and they are allowed to be
hooked into a sewer line, is there a requirement that the sewer
and water amendment be changed.
With regards to this
particular piece of property where they have the five lots where
the subdivision plat be recorded. Does the plat show that the
lots be connected to public water and sewer?”
Jackman: “Yes.”
Raley: “Why was the cart
put before the horse on this, if there was no emergency? What
your staff has done now is allow a 5 lot subdivision to be
recorded and some of them may have been sold. If we don’t
approve this water and sewer plan then the people who have
bought these lots….”
Canavan: “It was
recognized it 2002 that there were five failing lots, we are
bringing it to your attention, and if in the future, we would
advocate that they will hook up to sewer.”
Raley: “That’s not the
case here, they are vacant properties.”
Canavan; “I understand
the policy of the board.”
Raley: “I am just one
commissioner, I don’t set the policy, the board does.”
Mattingly: “I sometimes
have a failing memory and I don’t know where they got the five
lots from, and maybe this doesn’t apply, I have serious concerns
about the overall activity on this site and we need to get a
handle on what’s going on this property, there is a an extreme
amount of property, there are four or five new homes that have
gone up already, I don’t know how they get approvals on land
with mound systems on land that wouldn’t perc, what’s being
approved, to suggest that we go back into questionable
environmental concerns, they have already been cited once and
had to remove a road, they have an entire field disturbed with
what looks like a road system for something to be built back
there.
Russell: This sewage
pumping station has been built back there.
Raley: Metcom has
contributed to the cost of that plant.
Mattingly: “if those
systems fail, they will have to hook up to the Piney Point force
main line.”
Canavan: “What I am
hearing are issues outside of this and I can prepare a memo on
those but we have a proposal now for a hooking up sewer to for
these five lots and the planning commission recommended approval
of this.”
Mattingly:” go through
this and explain the parcels to us.”
Canavan: “This is a
subdivision that is proposed and it was proposed for these lots
to be hooked up to a public sewer, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11.”
Mattingly: “Are they
vacant lots?”
Canavan: “Yes.”
Jackman: “We really can’t
identify more than 2.”
Mattingly: “They have
taken dwellings that were on the other side of Andover Estates
Road and moved it down to the waterfront, the trailer and the
two other houses down to the waterfront.”
Jackman: “We found 4 of
them.”
Canavan: They cannot be
re-subdivided.
Jarboe: “Do any of these
lots have prerecorded EDU’s?”
Canavan: “No.”
Raley; “In order to move
forward, the Board is place din the position that we have a
recorded subdivision and I have expressed my displeasure in
agreeing with the staff report, on these five lots, if we don’t
approve that, what’s going to happen?”
Dement: “It will be hard
to deny what has happened in the past, in 2002.”
Mattingly; “the option
would be to find an appropriate place for a mound system.”
Raley: “we have a
recorded subdivision plat that says the lots will be hooked to
sewer and if a citizen bought the lot, and then we tell them no,
what can they do.”
Jarboe: “If there is no
capacity like in Leonardtown, you have to wait.”
Mattingly: “That’s a good
point.”
Raley: “But this recorded
subdivision plat was signed by Metcom and Land Use and Steve
King wouldn’t have signed that plat if there wasn’t capacity.”
Russell: “We see this
issue and we move on it.
Dement: can we table it.
I don’t how to word this motion it someone words it I’ll go
along with it.”
Canavan: “A motion to
approve lot 61 as recommended by the staff.”
Dement: “Move.”
Raley: “Second.”
Passed 3 -2 Russell,
Dement, Raley in favor.
Opposed: Mattingly, Jarboe
Reader Feedback:
It
sounds like to me that the developers are falling into a
pile of sh*%$ and coming out like a rose thanks to our
elected ones ( three of the five). How can Mr. Russell vote
on this matter with a conflict of interest. I ask if this is
legal? It sounds to me the only thing that stinks here are 3
of our elected commissioners.
Jimmy Gates