to the Editor:
The residents of
Leonardtown Landing love their homes. The
neighborhood is small, quaint and currently has
beautiful views of the waterfront. Unfortunately,
that will soon change if the Planning and Zoning
Board approves the latest version of the developer’s
plans.
The Leonardtown
Wharf project is scheduled to move forward despite
concerns from residents. The builder, Sturbridge
Homes, did not follow through on promises of a water
view and boat slips for residents in the final phase
of the project. WARNING-- before you purchase a
home at Leonardtown Landing read this letter! The
residents are outraged by the false promises and
deceptive marketing materials that were used and are
still being used to sell the Town homes. Resident
Yoon Shin stated, ”We were charged a huge premium
for a water view and now it appears our only view
will be a three-story building and a parking lot.”
This is according to the concept drawings proposed
by the developer, RAR Associates, during a recent
Planning and Zoning Board meeting. The only home
that will not have the view obstructed is owned by
the owner or CEO of RAR Associates, Mr. Ron Russo.
“As new residents to the area, we were promised
piers and a park-like setting with green space. My
dream of a water view is now being shattered by the
City’s desire to over build on this small parcel”,
said resident Kari An Behrens-Treyes.
Many residents
are just learning the truth about the dimensions of
the offices, shops, and loft apartments, which
apparently will be much taller in height and bigger
than the original plans showed. Resident Jerome
DuVal said, “I can’t understand why these plans were
approved and why weren’t all these issues addressed
prior to the initial concept being approved”. We
are talking about basic issue, like the school bus
or delivery truck not being able to turn-around on
Washington Street. There are still many issues that
need to be addressed such as parking, traffic flow
and most important to the residents, the height and
size of the two commercial buildings. Least of
which will have them lose one of the most precious
commodities, which is the water view. ”We want the
development to continue, but not at the risk of
losing everything we were promised when we purchased
a home here”. The residents pay over $5,400 in
taxes each year and deem themselves very important
stakeholders in all of this revitalization. Another
resident, Julie Hearns went on to say,” No one is
even talking about public safety and how the noise
level will impact the community, we live here”.
So far we have
caught the attention of the developer, Mr. Ron
Russo, of RAR Associates who has agreed to meet with
the Leonardtown Landing residents on October 6th
2007, before submitting his drawings to the Planning
and Zoning Board for final approval next month.
However, many long-time neighbors in the community
are skeptical based on the many changes the
developer has made to the original concept plan(s),
which changed from 16 to now 26 Townhomes on the
site—even the restaurant size has increased. It’s
not too late to change directions since the
three-story buildings have yet to be built. We hope
the developer will not only listen to our concerns
[which should be his concerns too] but act with a
conscious. “Only time will tell”, said resident
Rodney Flowers.
The Wharf
project is going to be here for many generations, so
please help us protect and preserve
what Leonardtown is all
about. Our public waterfront park is our best kept
secret. We need our elected officials to
take-action and not allow the history of the Wharf’s
waterfront view to be lost forever.
This letter is a
call-to-action and we need your help! If you live in
the area and want to voice your concerns or support
our efforts, please e-mail us at
leonardtownlanding@verizon.net
for more information.
Julie Hearns
Jerome DuVa
Yoon Shin
Kari An Behrens-Treyes
and
The Residents of Leonardtown Landing “One-voice,
One-community”
(Editor's
Note: These residents paid in the area of a
half million bucks each to have their views out over
Breton Bay, which they claim will be limited by
increasing the size of the retail development over
what had been disclosed to them....)