|
- Advertising Info. - Annapolis Newsline
- Archives - Cheap Shots - - Church Events: free listings - Classifieds - Commentary - The County Philosopher - - Court Reports - Drug Busts - DWI Hit Parade - Editorials - 2002 Election Coverage - Farm News - 1998 Election- - Heroes at Work: Fire & Rescue - Hunting & Fishing - Letters to the Editor - - Police Beat - Sports Beat - Local Gov't. Beat -Obituaries Lighthouses of Southern Maryland News or Advertising Call 301 535 8624 |
|||
News
Archive
Southern Maryland's
Only 24-hour Newsroom |
Guest Commentary
Homosexuals Should Pay More Insurance
By Nathan Tabor
With the big flap over so-called "gay marriage" temporarily on the back burner
- now that their fearless but feckless leader John Kerry has gone down in flames,
and with the first government-sanctioned same-sex unions already ending nastily in divorce
courts and bitter custody battles - this just might be an opportune moment to discuss some
rarely mentioned health problems inherent within the allegedly avant garde homosexual
lifestyle.
Some would say it is a known fact that most homosexuals, and especially gay men, are
promiscuous. Their rhetoric is carefully crafted to give the impression they are in
"committed, caring relationships" while research suggests that the vast majority
of gays are neither celibate nor monogamous. (All heterosexuals are not celibate or
monogamous either.)
Some may say, so what? Well, the corollary to this homosexual health hypothesis is another
proven fact: most sexually active homosexuals simply don't live a very long time. The
heartier they party, it seems, the shorter the time that party lasts.
According to a article entitled "The Longevity of Homosexuals" in the Omega
Journal of Death and Dying, the median age of death from AIDS for homosexual men is 37,
and the median age of death from other causes is 42. This does not compare favorably to
the ever-increasing average lifespan of the rest of the heterosexual American population.
An analysis conducted at the end of 1997 by the Centers for Disease Control revealed that
fully 60 percent of all AIDS cases in the United States are found among homosexual men.
This is an amazingly high figure, especially when we consider that homosexuals - contrary
to Kinsey's flawed study and fabricated "one-in-ten" myth - constitute only
about 1 to 2 percent of our total population.
The conclusion is simple. Homosexual activists say they want equal rights and treatment.
Fine. Let's use their own arguments against them here. Let's start by having them pay
their fair share of the healthcare costs that accompany their lifestyle.
Long-term medical treatment for HIV and AIDS is usually protracted and tremendously
expensive. Maybe that's why gay activists are pushing so hard for spousal benefits for
domestic partners of homosexuals - so somebody else, like the government or an employer,
will pick up the tab.
"Risky" behavior is called risky for a reason. It means that by doing it,
you put your life in danger. It's really a lot like gambling for high stakes. The more you
play, the more you stand to lose. For indulging in this risky behavior, you rightfully
SHOULD pay more for both life and health insurance.
This isn't a religious or even a moral values argument. This is strictly a common sense
fiscal argument. You play risky, you pay more. That's only fair. In fact, if these types
of policies aren't implemented, then health-conscious people are the ones being
discriminated against.
You can't blame the insurance companies for charging more. After all, their
likelihood of having to pay out large sums of money on behalf of their gay clients is
significantly greater.
Drinking and smoking, for example, are all directly related to dozens of diseases and
medical conditions. So insurance companies habitually charge higher premiums. But
non-smokers, non-drinkers and those who exercise get better rates than those who don't
practice such healthy lifestyle choices.
What about skydivers, hang gliders, and racecar drivers - do they pay the same life
insurance premiums as those who watch birds or collect stamps? Not hardly.
The same logic should be applied to practicing homosexuals. When actuaries and insurance
underwriters finally figure out this formula, we may see some instantaneous lifestyle
changes.
After all, their risky homosexual behavior is a lifestyle choice, not a destiny. If the
proven threat to their health won't do the trick, maybe the cost to their pocketbooks
will.
Copyright © 2005 by Nathan Tabor
Nathan Tabor is a conservative political activist based in Kernersville, North Carolina.
He has his BA in Psychology and his Master's Degree in Public Policy. He is a contributing
editor at www.theconservativevoice.com.
Contact him at Nathan@nathantabor.com.